Start A Conversation
Click here to chat with me!
Search our website now
Google will also submit information relevant to your search from “suggested” Google+ profiles and pages. If you select one of the suggested results, you will also have the option to add that person or thing to your Google+ Circles. The results are also labeled based on their level of publicity. If, however, the idea of personal info and images from your social network contacts showing up in your searches makes you uncomfortable (or just plain annoyed, since there have been complaints from users that many results on the personal side of things end up being irrelevant to their original search), you can turn the feature off using the toggle at the top of your search result page.
This new form of search result has potential for local businesses. Since Google now seems to be favoring references made in anything regarding its own social network (Google+ and Picasa, for example), having your friends sharing information about your business will mean you will show up higher in a local search when the personal results have been allowed. This also means that unique and creative copy may become just as important as SEO for your webpage.
There have been many questions raised about the potential privacy issues that may result from this kind of presentation. Marc Rotenberg, executive director of EPIC (Electronic Privacy Information Center), says “Although data from a user’s Google+ contacts is not displayed publicly, Google’s changes make the personal data of users more accessible.” Google has rebutted this by saying their personalized search results are encrypted, but the question of privacy is still frequently challenged. There is also the issue being raised that Google’s “personalized results” are biased toward its own programs, as mentioned above. That means that results from Facebook and Twitter are left out in the cold, while Google-affiliated results get pride of place. The concern being voiced is that Google may be ranking more-relevant results lower than less-relevant results simply to pump their own programs.